Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Alright
This is all fine and good and disturbing, potentially;
if it's true.
The problem lies in the "source familiar with the White House."
I understand that in journalism there are anonymous sources that speak out all of the time, and their voices are published. That's fine.
But as a blogger reading a blog, I say that this article holds no credibility until I know who the source is.
If I knew that, and knew that all of what is being said is true, I could begin to fight the good fight along side those who know that there is mischief afoot.
Until then I remain the lonely skeptic.
if it's true.
The problem lies in the "source familiar with the White House."
I understand that in journalism there are anonymous sources that speak out all of the time, and their voices are published. That's fine.
But as a blogger reading a blog, I say that this article holds no credibility until I know who the source is.
If I knew that, and knew that all of what is being said is true, I could begin to fight the good fight along side those who know that there is mischief afoot.
Until then I remain the lonely skeptic.
